Who are the main sources of information for evaluations of training programs and courses?

The correct choice, which identifies instructors and students as the main sources of information for evaluating training programs and courses, is based on the direct involvement and experience of these groups in the training process. Instructors possess firsthand knowledge of the course content, teaching methods, and student engagement, which provides valuable insights into what is effective and what could be improved. They can assess how well the training meets educational objectives and the needs of the learners.

Students are equally important in the evaluation process as they offer perspectives on the relevance, applicability, and clarity of the material presented. Their feedback can reveal how well the program meets their expectations, addresses their learning styles, and prepares them for real-world applications. Collectively, the insights from both instructors and students create a comprehensive evaluation of the program's effectiveness.

While administrators, industry experts, and curriculum developers contribute valuable perspectives, their role in program evaluation often lacks the same depth of immediate experience with the training as found with instructors and students. Administrators may focus more on administrative efficacy, while industry experts might assess alignment with broader industry standards, and curriculum developers may concentrate on the content structure rather than the instructional delivery.