Which generally accepted type of evaluation determines how well a program meets its goals or objectives through summative assessment?

The type of evaluation that focuses on determining how well a program meets its goals or objectives through summative assessment is goals-based evaluation. This approach assesses the effectiveness of a program by comparing its outcomes and impact against specific, predetermined goals. By identifying and measuring whether these objectives have been achieved, programs can assess their success and areas for improvement.

In the context of program evaluation, goals-based evaluation is particularly effective as it places emphasis on the intended results of a program. Summative assessments, which occur after a program has been implemented, allow evaluators to gather evidence of effectiveness and to make informed decisions about future actions or adjustments to the program.

Other evaluative methods, such as outcomes-based, formative, and norm-referenced evaluations, serve different purposes. Outcomes-based evaluation focuses on the end results of a program relative to long-term effects on participants. Formative evaluation occurs during the program implementation and is designed to provide feedback for ongoing improvements rather than assessing final outcomes. Norm-referenced evaluation compares individual or group performance against a normative standard, not directly linked to specific goals of the program in question.